TITLE: GCN CIRCULAR NUMBER: 20407 SUBJECT: LIGO/Virgo G268556: Gemini spectrum and Pan-STARRS observations of ATLAS17aeu DATE: 17/01/09 16:52:22 GMT FROM: S. J. Smartt at Queens U Belfast K. C. Chambers (IfA), S. Smartt (QUB), J. Tonry, L. Denneau, A. Heinze, B. Stalder, H. Weiland (IfA), C. W. Stubbs (Harvard), K. W. Smith (QUB), T.-W. Chen (MPE), T. Kruehler (MPE), D. R. Young (QUB), A. Rest (STScI), M. Coughlin (Harvard), M. E. Huber (IfA), D. E. Wright (QUB), H. Flewelling, E. A. Magnier, A. S. B. Schultz, C. Waters, R. J. Wainscoat (IfA) Further to our discovery of ATLAS17aeu (Tonry et al. GCN 20382), we took a spectrum with Gemini-North + GMOS (R400 grating, 4491-8778 Angs) on MJD = 57761.595. We also took an r-band image on the same night. The spectrum has a blue featureless continuum, with a signal-to-noise in the continuum S/N~10 at 7000Angs. There are no clear emission or absorption lines visible that can anchor a redshift estimate. The spectrum is not unlike some GRB afterglows as shown in the compilation of Fynbo et al. 2009, ApJS 185, 526 e.g. GRB060512, at z~2.1, GRB061110A (z=0.7578), GRB070129 (no z estimate, but below z<3.4) We report three more photometric points, two from Pan-STARRS1 and the other from Gemini+GMOS. MJD Mag Telescope 57758.38159 18.18 0.04 i Pan-STARRS1 57759.46468 20.90 0.12 i Pan-STARRS1 57761.51968 22.77 0.17 r Gemini+GMOS These data further support the hypothesis of Kasliwal et al. GCN 20393 that this is most likely the afterglow of GRB170105A, supported by the x-ray and radio detections of Evans et al. GCN 20390 and Corsi et al. GCN 20396. Using the POLAR detection time, a temporal index of F_nu \propto t**(-1.4) would be consistent with the photometry reported to date, typical of GRB afterglows. We note there are several other faint galaxies closer to ATLAS17aeu than the brighter galaxy at z = 0.199 highlighted in Tonry et al. (GCN 20382). They have SDSS photometric redshifts of z ~ 0.35 - 0.38, but are marginal detections in more than one band and therefore the photometric redshifts are uncertain.