TITLE: GCN GRB OBSERVATION REPORT NUMBER: 955 SUBJECT: GRB010214, candidate optical afterglow DATE: 01/02/21 17:41:23 GMT FROM: Evert Rol at U.Amsterdam E. Rol, I. Salamanca, L. Kaper, P. Vreeswijk (University of Amsterdam), P. Lacerda (Leiden Observatory), S. Hodgkin, P. Tzanavaris (University of Cambridge), N. Tanvir (University of Hertfordshire), report on behalf of a larger collaboration: "We have observed the BeppoSAX error box of GRB010214 (Gandolfi, GCN #932) with the 4.2m William Herschel Telescope (+ Prime Focus) and with the 2.2m Isaac Newton Telescope (+ WFC) at La Palma, as follows: Telescope Date Filter Exp.time Seeing Lim. mag. (UT) (secs) (") (3 sigma) ================================================================= WHT (+PF) 2001 Feb 15.26 R 2 x 225 0.84 ~23.5 INT (+WFC) 2001 Feb 17.25 R 2 x 900 1.2 ~24.2 (Note that in our calibration, the USNO star mentioned by Masetti et al. (GCN #945) has a magnitude of R=18.4 instead of R=18.3.) Within the refined NFI error box (Frontera et al., GCN #950), we detect one object which faded from R = 22.9 to R = 24.1 (1 sigma error about 0.2 mag) between the two observations. The source seems to be extended, likely to be due to an underlying galaxy. We consider this object to be a strong candidate for the optical afterglow of GRB010214. The candidate is located at RA = 17:41:02.9 and Dec = 48:34:30 (J2000; error about 1 arcsec). Another variable source is located just outside the refined NFI error box, though within the initial NFI error box (Gandolfi, GCN #937), with a position of RA = 17:41:04.6, Dec = 48:33:47 (J2000). This source has faded from R = 23.1 to 24.0 (error of ~0.2 mag). The infrared object mentioned by Di Paola et al. (GCN #939; see also Antonelli, GCN #944) is clearly visible in our images (R~22.6 in the WHT image). We measure two slightly different magnitudes (difference of about 0.3), which might indicate a variable star. Images and more information can be found on http://www.astro.uva.nl/~evert/grb010214/ This message can be cited."